There is no record of a purchase.

A keel will be lading at Guyhirn on Friday next.
On the dorse a draft of a letter from Norgate to the authorities of, probably, Norwich requesting a nomination of a scholar.

He sends 4b in the knowledge that Caldwell had purchased the portrait of the wife of the Hon. Frederick Keppel at the sale of the effects of the late Provost of King's, Richard Okes, d. 1888.

Meanwhile Wallis provides a summary list. As to old pictures he notes that the 'old list' gives 25, and one much damaged, of which he can find only 24. Annotated by Caldwell, 27 Feb. 1906

Nos 16-18 not used.
There are many items relating to the maintenance of college buildings in the bursars' accounts (CCCC02/B).
Many of the documents relating to the college chapels are separately listed.

Nos 16-18 not used.
There are many items relating to the maintenance of college buildings in the bursars' accounts (CCCC02/B).
Many of the documents relating to the college chapels are separately listed.

Nos 16-18 not used.
There are many items relating to the maintenance of college buildings in the bursars' accounts (CCCC02/B).
Many of the documents relating to the college chapels are separately listed.

Nos 11-13, 26-199 not used. 223 (1) relates to the manor of Barton Lancaster and is there housed and listed.
See also under Grantchester XXXVI G 129.1: Dr Hooke's notebook of his livings at Grantchester and Little Wilbraham, 1762-76.
Membrane 5 of 09/35/141 has records of the court of Wilbraham Rycotts for 1631, 1635 and 1636.

He is meeting Fawcett on Wednesday 11 Dec., and will come to Peed's house before that.

'I think it would be better if Mr Caldwell or you would give me instructions to treat with Mr Fawcett - he ought not to object to my report but London surveyors always like to fight.'

He has sent the demand, for more than the £500 mentioned, to Fawcett, who has forwarded it to the Vice-Chancellor

He has heard that a syndicate is to meet on 6 March. 'Mr Fawcett does not seem to have any Instructions and I think it might be as well if you were to write to the Vice-Chancellor to ask for an answer to the claim.'

A syndicate has been appointed to consider the matter; has already met and will meet again shortly whereupon he expects to be able to communicate with college.

He reports on an interview with a representative of the university, and suggests that the case go to arbitration.

Apologising for not being in town on the previous day, and giving dates when he will not be available.

In the event the college and the university came to agreement; the college conceding its claim but hoping that in exchange the university should make no similar claim in the event of the college erecting new buildings on the other side of Free School Lane.
Many of the items are endorsed in purple ink, probably in the hand of Samuel Peed, solicitor.

The property had passed from Archbishop Parker to his son John and thence to Sir George Paul; Josias Horne and his wife Frances and John Parker's son Matthew also acquiring parts of the property. The college sues Sir George for £60 arrears in payment of the annuity. Sir George countersues.

The writer confirms the opinion of A. Oswald (see next). He considers that the glass dates from the very early 16th century, or earlier, and is undoubtedly Flemish. He supposes that it was acquired by Wilkins specifically for the chapel and disposed of other pieces in private houses, e.g. Lensfield House, and King's College Memorial Chapel.

He recalls reading that the windows were obtained from Mr Hampp, a Dutch merchant, at Norwich (where Wilkins' father lived). See Bury, p. 14, and Chapter Book 6, p. 10.

Recites the sums due. The college attorney, Toby Woode, is being sent to Sir George to demand payment.

Endorsed with W. Gurnall's receipt for 12s from Mr Bramston for the copies